Joined
·
310 Posts
It appears if you don't have a Facebook account, you're not going to see the video.You've been a bad boy so Facebook blocked your video,
You are correct. No changes have been made (yet) to the fuel or ignition timing maps. The only changes we have made is to the throttle mapping.Let's see some before and after dynamometer data from Guhl Motors. Data has been very scarce.
There may be little or no increase in power and I don't see a need to rev a torquey motor higher. It just stresses the parts and who knows what rpm the valve springs are designed for.
I believe the main change is in throttle progressivity, so, how can you judge the power output when you don't know the true relationship between the position of your wrist and the angle of the throttle plate.
Thanks for factual update. No doubt some additional power can be found if the bike is tuned for premium fuel instead of 87 octane. Let's see a 91 octane tune.You are correct. No changes have been made (yet) to the fuel or ignition timing maps. The only changes we have made is to the throttle mapping.
In the future we may start to do some work on the fuel and ignition mapping, but for now our main goals were to smooth out the Sport Mode, improve power in Tour Mode, and get rid of the speed limiter, and we have achieved those goals.
I have no clue as to why the new models speed is limited to 112mph. Too low in my opinion.
But, just a thought.
The previous generation 1800s top speed was limited by air resistance on the fairing/windscreen to around 130 mph. It was stable at that speed. The new wing has a smaller frontal profile and about the same power so, theoretically, it will go faster. But what happens to its stability? And, at what speed may a problem develop?
Did Don remove that limiter when he was doing the changes for low speed issue?Actually, the previous generation Wing has a speed limiter of 200kph (about 124mph) set in its ECM.
Yes.Did Don remove that limiter when he was doing the changes for low speed issue?
Do we no what the resulting speed capability was (on a closed track, of course)?
I may be ignorant of the facts and require enlightenment. My current understanding is that the use of higher octane fuel...by itself...can't possibly increase power performance. All it can do is retard ignition.Thanks for factual update. No doubt some additional power can be found if the bike is tuned for premium fuel instead of 87 octane. Let's see a 91 octane tune.
Yes, but those are the new 1833/6 speed.Yes.
In this thread there is a vid of a 6-speed manual with the pin buried at 135 in 5th gear. In the FB thread, the rider says the bike has more to give. No mention of what a GPS or radar said, or a final top speed. IIRC, the rider said he slowed down after getting to 135.
Yes, but those are the new 1833/6 speed.
What I was wondering about was the ECM's that were modified for the 1832's -- which had the 200kph speed limiter Fred H posted about.
(200kph approx = 124 mph; which resulted in somewhere around 128 or 130 indicated on the 1832's)
O.k. Didn't see the 1832 reference in your post.Yes, but those are the new 1833/6 speed.
What I was wondering about was the ECM's that were modified for the 1832's -- which had the 200kph speed limiter Fred H posted about.
(200kph approx = 124 mph; which resulted in somewhere around 128 or 130 indicated on the 1832's)