Congrats! I'm going to retire next year at 56 and have been wondering if I should take it at 62 or wait until later. I've read the pros and cons and it looks like I'll take it at 62 too. How did you reach the decision to take it at 62 instead of later?
If you live the average life span, it's a break even deal. It doesn't matter when you take it, you get the same amount of money. That's how they calculated the amount they add to your monthly payment for waiting.
If you live less, you get less. If you live longer you get more. There's a small additional penalty for taking it before your so-called normal retirement age, 66 or so these days.
Here's the argument for waiting, if that's an option for you. If you die earlier than expected, you get less money than you could have. But how big a deal is that? If you live longer than average, you have more money near the end of your life, when, for various reasons, you may really need it. It adds to the security of not running out.
That argument persuades me, but it doesn't persuade the majority of people. Most take it as soon as they can. Of course, in some cases that's absolutely necessary.
There's little chance that social security will be reduced any more for older folks who wait, than for those who don't, but it does exist. That's the grab it while you can argument, which I don't find persuasive at all. If that happens, we're in really deep trouble anyway.