Thanks Tom, that's interesting. Have you done any wind tunnel testing with a trailer behind a motorcycle? It would be interesting to see that done using a Goldwing with 2 people aboard as that's how most of us travel instead of a trailer standing alone in the wind. Better yet, take that test to the road using some kind of scale in the tongue to measure the total amount of energy it takes to pull a trailer. Then compare a streamlined trailer with a boxy one. Then add a big cooler to the tongue, right in front of the cargo box like I have done. I'm guessing that big cooler really wrecks the airflow.
For what it's worth... I ride a 1500 wing 6,000 miles a year and tow a trailer about 25% of that. In my wildest dreams I could never rack up the kind of miles you talk about! So while all of this may be important to you and many others out there, it doesn't really matter to me. If I pull an inefficient trailer and lose a couple of miles per gallon vs a more efficient one it's only going to waste $10 in fuel per season. I can afford that. You always say your trailers aren't for everyone and I appreciate that. Thankfully, we have a lot of good choices.
Howdy, Jerry! As of last fill up this morning I have 936,863 miles of puling trailers with motorcycles and 1,138,869 miles of riding all together. There are interesting interactions involved when pulling a trailer. You may know that in high speed races in cars or even bicycle races that the leader of a twosome also can go faster with his chaser close behind. That effect is true while pulling a trailer also. Therefore using a strain gage on the drawbar of a trailer does not tell the correct story.
There is an old saying that life is what happens to you while you make other plans. In my youth I took vocational electrical training and planned to head that direction. Always heard that motorcycling was dangerous and for the less than savory people. Then my younger brother got a used James (The Famous James) but was too young to get a license for it and I got my drivers license at 14, so I could, with him riding on the back. He wore his hair in Duck Tails and I thought he might end up in jail if he did not quit hanging around with guys like that. Well he went to fight in Korea, has led an exemplary life, and has won Best in World in Maryland competition in carving birds of prey in wood more than once.
However, I became the addict. I was hopelessly addicted to riding a motorcycle. When I decided to get married, I had to do something to keep from being caged, so I designed and built a trailer for my new 1957 Ariel Square Four, my third new motorcycle. The trailer I built was an all aluminum camper with independent suspension,
A year later I traded the Square Four in on a new 1958 model. In 1959, Ariel and most of the British motorcycle manufacturers quit producing motorcycles. I continued to pull my trailer for 5 years and put 85,000 miles on it. I became afraid of not being able to get parts for the Ariel and traded it for a new 1963 BMW R69S, rated at the same 42 horsepower as the Square Four was. Deigned a nice hitch of Chromolly Tubing. Then I was devastated to learn that while the Square Four had 42 horsepower around the clock, the new Beemer only had 42 horsepower at noon on Tuesday.
I was thrust headlong into the world of aerodynamic drag. The new Beemer would slow down after accelerating in third and shifting into High (fourth) at full throttle. Because the Square Four was part John Deere, I did not know I was pulling a parachute for 5 years. I had hooked a race horse to a plow. That event changed the course of my life forever.
I went to my friend Ed Swearingen and said I had an aerodynamic drag issue with my trailer.
http://www.airportjournals.com/Display.cfm?varID=0905003 Ed and I had hobby projects in Speaker System Development and building Pipe Organs. He pulled a napkin from the holder on the table where we were eating lunch and sketched an aerodynamic shape. I took his sketch and did an engineering drawing with modifications to fit the Camping use of it and built a new trailer at night at his aircraft works.
Although my new trailer was a half foot wider and 3 feet longer than my old trailer, it had nearly no drag and the 600 cc Beemer pulled it with ease. I became interested in aircraft design an in a couple years moved from being involved with Ed in building pipe organs to becoming head of his R&D, designing 90% of the moving parts on the Merlin and Metro aircraft and a large amount of the structure, the entire landing gear and hydraulic systems, etc. etc.
I went from there to form TEFCO and manufacture Trailers, Trailer hitches, ride off Stands, Fairing lowers, etc. for the Wing and Beemers in the 70s and 80s, and at the same time doing contract aircraft design. One customer, The Dee Howard Company, was about to loose a major contract furnishing thrust reversers to Learjet because of the new FAA Part 36 Noise limiting rules adopted by Congress. Either the Lear would have Bill Lear's claimed quieting nozzle or quit flying. That outsized nozzle would not allow thrust reverser to be installed. An alternative to this was to improve the aerodynamic performance of the Lear so it would take less thrust and climb faster above the departure microphones. However, Bill Lear, NASA, and Aeronautics R&D had all had their turn at bat to improve the Lear and abandoned their projects because none were successful. Dee Howard hired an Ex Boeing engineer to do a drag reduction program and each thing he did made the airplane worse. These included Banana Shaped Tip Tanks, zero length inlet for the nacelles, beaver tail tips on the tip tanks, etc. By that time I was acting head of his R&D and Dee asked me what should be done and I said we needed to determine what was wrong with the airplane.
He said OK. I pressure mapped the airplane and found what was wrong with it. I developed several aerodynamic changes and reduced the drag of the Lear by 20% and designed a new nozzle hat improved the trust by 2% at cruise. That still stands as the most improvement ever accomplished on a jet aircraft. I have done other similar projects since.
To answer your comment about ice boxes, etc., it does not make much sense do do anything to degrade the aerodynamics of the Tailwind, nor is it reasonable to immerse the icebox in the effluent of the radiator cooling flow and scrub the cooler with hot air. The Tailwind has a recessed floor between the wheels to provide space for the most massive cargo items where they will have the least impact on stability, and also to prevent high mass cargo from shifting aft which is very dangerous.
I totally understand your comment about not using a bike all that much. I never claimed to be normal but there are others, well a few, that ride more miles a year than I do. Dick Meyer does at least.
I would say this however. When you have a rig that performs so well, it ends up being used a lot more than one that doesn't. You rarely see a Tailwind chained to a tree at a rally although most of the other trailers are. Needing to run home and get the cage to go to the grocery store or cleaners or hardware store is not necessary and that can provide a lot of freedom when planning your day with a bike.
If you only lose 2 mpg at highway speeds by putting a trailer on, you are lucky. It is not unusual to see a 5 mpg penalty or worse for cargo trailers. With the diluted fuels we have now, you already lose about 2 to 4 mpg depending on the mix. That is a real farce but I dare not get into this topic.
There are other things to consider when reviewing trailers in addition to aerodynamics. Durability, safety, cargo damage, tire availability, handling, ease of use, loading and unloading, night visibility are just a few.
Speaking of 1500 Wings, I sold my last 1500 to a very long time friend. It is a 93 SE and had 257,000 miles on it. Now it has 298,000. Last weekend he won three categories at a rally. Oldest rider (81), Best looking 1500, and most miles on a bike. Below is that Wing and my 04 wing about the time my friend bought the 93. My 04 now has 236,000 on it and the 2010 has 64,000 on it. I have not ridden without a trailer in several years other than for bike service or when delivering a trailer. As an aside, I have used Dunlop E3s 70 series since they came out, abut 270,000 miles. They last about 20,000 miles per set with the front able to go further but I change them in pairs.
Thank you for your comments. Probably several riders wonder about these things but do not comment. I hope that you get to ride as much as you want.