Larry, it's when someone comes to the board, asks a question & others start preaching there is no need to change. Hell, there are aftermarket companies that make their living selling parts that no one needs.
How many times have you read that "I have x amount of miles on my stock seat & it's the best I've ever ridden" or "I have x miles on stock suspension & see no need to change" or "I get xx,xxx miles out of brand x tires & they're the best, no need to change"
Sleddog
You have your facts wrong bud! If you go back and look at the original post, he asked about interpreting the brightness claims of aftermarket replacement bulbs. It was later on that posts inevitably popped up about HID, just like they always do. Those posts had nothing to do with the topic. My comments were in response to the HID posts. I think it is an unnecessary modification, not to mention irresponsible.
I actually don't have a problem with higher wattage bulbs, and I stated that in an earlier post. My concern was aimed specifically at the technical problems involved in higher wattage bulbs, which is the reason I haven't done it myself.
Regardless, I don't see a problem with someone making a post downplaying a modification to a bike, whether it's lights, suspension or whatever. If you can state what you think is a good reason, then it is a useful post. Most posters want to hear the good, the bad, and the ugly. If a person only wanted to hear the good, why bother posting? :shock: They may as well just go out and buy it, because according to your posting preferences, nobody is going to tell them not to. Would that make any sense at all?
There are a lot of accessories that you can buy out there. Some are good. And others seem like a good idea at the time, and it isn't until you have it that you realize it wasn't worth the time or money. There are far more useless accessories out there than useful ones.