Joined
·
2,175 Posts
My early suspicions of the new “no more keys” vehicle technology being a major step backwards in anti-theft controls have been confirmed. This is just a little more complicated than “get in, push start, drive away” in terms of needing a good bit of preparation with more technology, but 30 seconds to be able to drive away in “your new car” to take to your chop shop or garage and replace the fob module paired with a new fob. See link and “ring doorbell” video. At least the keyless entry fobs with key start could be set up with rotating codes that change with every button push, but how can the fob for keyless ignition do that when it has no trigger to change codes and a “hand shake” with the vehicle to trigger a change will not work because the captured fob signal on the “relay receiver” that enables the vehicle will also know when to switch and even what to switch to during the theft because the switch would happen during the theft. Now someone may think about RSA tokens that display a 6-digit number used for computer security and authentication and try to use that for code rotation. That is again, not good enough. That just means that the thief will be unable to use the captured fob code to start a second time or end up spending more time reading the codes as they time out and change. Frankly, that just means that once you drive away, you keep it running until you get to your chop shop; which will be what happens anyway.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/370359/t...ail&utm_campaign=whatsnewnow&utm_medium=title
OK, so a Model T is not quite as easy as get in, push start, and drive away. You have to move a switch to “run”, get out and quickly rotate an actual crank before you can drive away.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/370359/t...ail&utm_campaign=whatsnewnow&utm_medium=title
OK, so a Model T is not quite as easy as get in, push start, and drive away. You have to move a switch to “run”, get out and quickly rotate an actual crank before you can drive away.